Masters of ships shall be representatives of the employer or shipowner in accordance with Art. 32 T.S.C. and art. 1495, Inc. 2º C. de Co. (Casaciã³n of September 9, 1988). In another case, the employer`s failure to comply with safety rules was considered certified because the chief or chief of crew, who was acting as the crew representative, did not comply with his or her obligation to check or inspect the rod before transporting the worker and did not provide the necessary tools to prevent an accident, because it was he who had to ensure© compliance with©the security measures( SL10194 – 2017; SL1938 – 2018). The legal representative can be an employee of the company, that is, he can be bound by an employment contract. Employment contracts and certifications of the company`s employees are signed by the manager or legal representative, but who signs the employment contract or the services and certifications of the legal representative? The National Labour Relations Board prohibits employers from interfering, restricting or forcing employees to interfere, restrict or compel employees to exercise their rights in relation to the organization, training, membership or participation in a work organization for collective bargaining or cooperation in order to improve working conditions.

or refrain from such activities. Similarly, workers` organizations may not restrict or compel workers to exercise these rights. (a) The management and trust positions of the company shall be determined and determined in accordance with the law; “ARTICLE 36 JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY. Partnerships and their partners and their partners are jointly and severally liable for all obligations arising from the employment contract and are jointly and severally liable with regard to the object of the company and only up to the limit of liability of each partner and the owners or citizens of the same company between them, as long as they remain in the division. On the other hand, registration point No 000807818, which extends to pages ten to eleven, shows that the actor exercised the function of legal representative of the company in matters of insurance in the tac±na branch, which was one of his powers: `(a) representation of the company in the jurisdiction of the tacna branch. Signature of all documents relating to the presentation of proposals and offers to potential clients, as well as documents relating to the post-placement advisory service (â¦), b) to inform the Board of Directors of the State of the progress of the creation (â¦), c) Exercise of the powers expressly conferred on it by the Board of Directors Likewise, in the minutes of the twenty-first of the two thousand and eleven February, that the defendant company is entered in the register of the insurance system with liquidation S.B.S., represented by the plaintiff. On the other hand, it is made by the item of the ninth of May of two thousand twelve, which extends over pages fourteen, and communications which, among other things, from the year ± or two thousand ten to two thousand twelve, which extend on pages forty-two to sixty-three, on the coordination made with the applicant with regard to the services of the company, confirmed. In general, the legal representative is elected by the general meeting or the general meeting (Article 187 Article 4 of the Commercial Code), and finally, this power can be delegated to the Board of Directors. It follows from the foregoing that, for example, the law does not confer on the chartered accountant of a company the status of representative of the employer, since the accounting function of a technical©nature is not included in the report of Article 32 of the C.S.T., since it is foreign to any activity of management and administration (Chamber of 27 April 1962).

An employer is the person who, within the company or as a freelancer, must ensure that people who work directly at home or with him have good working conditions, respect their rights and offer them facilities. Finally, in an ocasión (Cassation du travail of 8 October 1992, MP Hugo Suescãºn Pujols), the possibility of classifying a dismissal as illegal was discussed, considering that the interruption of the connection did not come from a legitimate employee. In the present case, it has been argued that the incompetence of the civil servant according to the internal labour regulations (of the National Association of Coffee Producers) does not imply the nullity (or ineffectiveness) of the dismissal or its classification as unfair, since the person who orders or communicates it does not belong to the “hierarchical superiors” mentioned in the relevant rule of the above regulation. Such a legal consequence requires a requirement that it clearly enshrines (legally, from a regulatory, contractual or conventional point of view), because otherwise it is obvious that such a restriction of representation, which, with the character of a mandatory rule and public order, Article 32 C.S.T. cannot be inferred from a rule limited to the indication of an internal hierarchy within the company, without expressly demonstrating that failure to comply with the regulatory requirement results in the nullity of the dismissal. It is very important to have an employer with this quality, because they are people who can calmly analyze the changes and quickly acclimatize to work in any situation. In any event, it must be necessary to analyse the nature of the company which governs the undertaking required to cooperate with the employee, since the legislation lays down the forms of association and thus regulates the events in which there is an extension of joint and several liability or the inclusion of the assets of the members in that of the company, meet the company`s obligations. But this limit of liability does not imply ignorance of workers` rights. i) Personal advantage: this is the activity whose use is the subject of the employment contract, it is the specific activity of a particular employee. It is mainly deduced that the employee, unlike the employer, is always a natural person. It must also perform the promised service, which cannot be partially transferred to a third party. In short, this is the activity carried out directly by the employee and which cannot be delegated to third parties, as defined in Article 5 of the ordered text of Legislative Decree No.

728, Law on Productivity and Competitiveness of Labor, approved by Supreme Decree No. 003-97-TR; 16. Similarly, the qualification of greeting or trust is a formality to be respected by the employer. Failure to comply with this condition shall not preclude that condition where the evidence adduced has been produced. » Changing the legal representative follows the same steps as your initial order. Once the partners have approved the amendment, the following steps must be followed: the Court of Justice has held, in the first case, that the function of mere intermediary who does not exercise subordination ends in its entirety when the contract of employment is concluded between the worker and the employer; and that in the second case, we find those who group or coordinate employees to provide services to another who will exercise subordination, but with the possibility of continuing to act as intermediaries during the employment relationship concluded exclusively between the employer and the employee. In such a case, the intermediary may, on presentation by an independent contractor, cease to work in the dependencies and means of production of the actual contractor, provided that these are its own activities or that they are related to the normal course of the beneficiary`s business. In any case, contracts must be signed by the legal representative, even if the preparation corresponds to another person. The legal representative is the person responsible for: You might also be interested in: Complete guide to the types of companies to start a business in Chile, and Do you need a lawyer to change companies? and How is the change of a society made?.